51 results found for ALL OF: python | EXACT PHRASE: (object) | FROM SITE: stackoverflow.com
Why is it that you don't have to declare (object) for a class that only has __init__ in python? Why is it that you don't have to declare (object) for
Basically though, "Is what you want basically a class that can reset an instance (object) to a set of default values? " yes it was. Here's another answer kind
mObject[0] = (Object) mString; mObject[1] = (Double) mDouble; } String getString() { if (mObject[0] instanceof String) return (String) mObject[0]; else return
this point) Tags: python default-value Class methods must have the instance variable (object) `self` as their first variable. 99% of the time, you're not
change the value (object) itself, then all references to it will be updated: >>> a = [] >>> b = a # b refers to the same object a is refering right now >>>
variable self.cols? Is it because the superclass of of DataRow (object) has 'cols' in its namespace because we're still within the local namespace of the
new-style classes. I recommend you get in the habit of always typing that (object) on any class definition to make sure it is a new-style class. Old-style
First of all, you're using old-style classes. You should probably use new-style classes, like so: class MetaDataElement(object): ... Note the (object) .
(object) : def __init__ (self) : self._values = [1, 2, 3] def __iter__ (self) : return self._next () def _next (self) : for v in self._values : yield v raise
tensors. Instead of setting the array element type to 'O' (object) you should set it to a tuple. See the SciPy manual for some examples. In your case,